Search technical reports
A Method for Studying Boron Redistribution and Leaching in Timber Framing
By J A Drysdale, N Marston, M E Hedley, May 2011.
Download Drysdale_IRG42_Queenstown__presentation (pdf)
Executive summary
Presentation from the International Research Group on Wood Protection
- From 1950’s pine framing was required to be treated to prevent risk from wood borer
- Boron treatment was dominant
- Any fungicidal benefit was not recognized in the preservative specification
- From mid 1990’s there was an industry move to dry untreated framing
- By 1998 -99 concerns being raised about evidence of decay in buildings
- From 2001-2003 various reviews and changes were being implemented
- H1Plus treatments for framing (permethrin & iodocarb)
- December 2003; new Standards published [NZS3640, NZS3602] and Hazard Class 1.2 recognised
- H1.2 and H3.1 treatments for timber framing in different applications from 2004 -2011
- March 14th 2011, the Department of Building & Housing announced H1.2 as single framing hazard classes & all framing (external& internal walls ) & roof trusses to be treated
Specialty Timbers New Zealand
No posts yet
Add a post